Saturday, October 15, 2016

The Sun: San Bernardino County official charged in DUI had prior conviction, future in question

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-55898 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg" alt="SBCO" width="300" height="154" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg 667w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

 

By Joe Nelson, The Sun /> Posted: 10/14/16 – 4:30 PM PDT |

West Covina Councilman Mike Spence has battled alcoholism and drug abuse for more than 20 years, he said during a recent interview when confronted about a DUI he pleaded guilty to in 1998.

id="more-70298">The revelations may place Spence's future with San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman, for whom he is chief of staff, in question.

Spence, 50, ran for 55th District state Assemblyman this year, but he came in third in the June primary. He has been candid in admitting to his alcoholism and use of methamphetamine and cocaine, and said he has attended 12-step programs including Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous.

He has even admitted to having blackouts.

In February 1998, Spence pleaded guilty in West Valley Superior Court in Rancho Cucamonga to one misdemeanor count of driving under the influence of alcohol, court records show.

“I never claimed to be perfect,” Spence said in a recent telephone interview. “That was something that happened 20 years ago.”

On June 12, Spence crashed his rented Hyundai Accent into a utility pole near the intersection of Azusa Avenue and Cypress Street in Covina. Police determined he was driving under the influence of an illegal drug - methamphetamine. A toxicology report revealed there was no alcohol in his system.

Spence was charged Sept. 26 with one misdemeanor count of driving under the influence of a drug, a misdemeanor. He is scheduled for arraignment Thursday in West Covina Superior Court.

Per the terms of his 1998 plea agreement, Spence was ordered by Superior Court Judge Michael J. Welch to attend a county-approved alcohol program, pay a fine of $1,224, and serve three years probation. He was granted a restricted driver's license allowing him to drive to and from work and to his alcohol treatment program, court records show.

In California, prior misdemeanor convictions older than 10 years are not alleged in a defendant's new misdemeanor filing, according to Sarah Ardalani, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office.

“That said, there were no prior previous convictions listed in the current misdemeanor complaint against Michael Spence,” Ardalani said in an email.

San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman said in a telephone interview he was unaware of Spence's 1998 DUI conviction, and previously stated he was unaware of Spence's longtime struggle with addiction. He said he did not meet Spence until 2007, during his campaign for state Assembly.

Hagman appointed Spence as his chief of staff when he was elected 55th District state Assemblyman in 2008, then kept him on as his chief of staff when he was elected Fourth District county supervisor in 2014.

“I do believe in people starting anew,” said Hagman, adding that Spence, in the 10 years he has worked for Hagman, has always been an exemplary employee.

“In the (state) Assembly, we'd do independent assessments of each office's operations, and my office always came in at number one,” Hagman said.

Spence suffered severe injuries including a broken back, hip, femur, and ribs in his June 12 accident. He has been recovering ever since. He still claims to have no recollection of the day of his accident, and while he has admitted to having blackouts in the past, he could not say if his accident was a drug-induced blackout, as he has not been provided a copy of the accident report as he has requested.

“The hospital told me blackouts in car accidents happen all the time,” Spence said.

Spence's admissions regarding his addictions have sounded an alarm with Hagman.

“It definitely raises concerns,” Hagman said. He said the county has good health benefits and other resources available, which he encourages Spence utilize.

“We wish him a speedy recovery, and to address those demons that he's facing,” Hagman said. He said it is still too soon to say if he will retain Spence as his chief of staff.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sbsun.com/government-and-politics/20161014/san-bernardino-county-official-charged-in-dui-had-prior-conviction-future-in-question">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/15/san-bernardino-county-official-charged-dui-prior-conviction-future-question/">The Sun: San Bernardino County official charged in DUI had prior conviction, future in question appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

InlandPolitics: Expanded coverage of San Bernardino County dead children cover-up

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-55898 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg" alt="SBCO" width="300" height="154" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg 667w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

Thursday, October 13, 2016 – 09:00 a.m.

San Bernardino County hiring am outside law firm to represent it in an unfolding scandal involving multiple child deaths has thrown gas on the fire.

id="more-70270">Not-to-mention the abrupt retirement of Assistant Chief Executive Officer Linda Haugen.

The scandal-ridden Department of Children and Family Services (CFS) was under Haugen's area of responsibility.

Why the county feels it needs an outside law firm to communicate with the state attorney general, and now likely Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), raises serious questions.

Allegations of Grand Jury obstruction and cover-up are rampant.

This past Saturday's edition of the San Bernardino County Sentinel newspaper printed an expanded article on the subject.

To read the article, click href="http://sbcsentinel.com/2016/10/county-brings-in-hired-gun-to-stand-down-ag-probe-into-child-deaths/">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/13/expanded-coverage-san-bernardino-county-dead-children-cover/">InlandPolitics: Expanded coverage of San Bernardino County dead children cover-up appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Daily Bulletin: Ontario airport authority gears up for takeover

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69848 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority-300x178.jpg" alt="Ontario International Airport Authority" width="300" height="178" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority-300x178.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority.jpg 380w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

By Liset Márquez, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin /> Posted: 10/03/16 – 4:25 PM PDT |

ONTARIO >> They say timing is everything.

When the Ontario International Airport Authority issues bonds Nov. 1 - the same day it formally takes over control of LA/Ontario International Airport - there could be some savings for future operations.

id="more-70195">Officials expect to issue the new bonds at lower interest costs.

The authority will assume $55.5 million in outstanding bonds debt for Ontario airport from Los Angeles World Airports, which operates the airport as well as Los Angeles International Airport.

“Cash flow savings on debt service will be offset by a like reduction in rates and charges paid by the airlines operating at the Airport in accordance with the terms of the Operating Use and Terminal Lease Agreements,” according to a staff report to the authority.

Officials won't know just how much is saved until the 2016 bonds are priced, which could happened by Oct. 17.

The 2016 bonds are scheduled to close in tandem with the transfer of the airport, according to the report.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/business/20161003/ontario-airport-authority-gears-up-for-takeover">here.

 

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/05/ontario-airport-authority-gears-takeover/">Daily Bulletin: Ontario airport authority gears up for takeover appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The Weekly Standard: Five paths to victory for Trump.

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg"> class=" wp-image-67628 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg" alt="Electoral Map - 2012" width="574" height="373" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg 998w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012-300x195.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012-768x499.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px" />

Electoral Mapmaking /> Oct 03, 2016 | By Jeffrey H. Anderson

One of the most pervasive myths in American politics is that a “Big Blue Wall” will protect Democratic presidential nominees, perhaps even those who lose the popular vote. In truth, this electoral Blue Wall is more like a collection of disconnected forts-some imposing, some not-and the loss of any one of them would likely doom the Democratic nominee.

id="more-70115">The Blue Wall-states where the Democrats have won every presidential race since 1992-includes the entire Northeast except for New Hampshire, the Midwestern Great Lakes states aside from Ohio and Indiana, the three Pacific Coast states, and Hawaii. Even holding the wall is no guarantee of victory. John Kerry won the entire Blue Wall in 2004, plus New Hampshire, yet still lost to George W. Bush by 35 electoral votes. Al Gore won the entire Blue Wall in 2000-back when it was worth 13 more electoral votes-plus Iowa and New Mexico, yet still lost to Bush by 5 electoral votes. For the Democrats, holding the Blue Wall is necessary but not sufficient.

It is often claimed that Donald Trump has several must-win states, and this is true (although the states listed are often wrong). In addition to the 23 states that Mitt Romney won by at least 7 percentage points, which Trump isn't going to lose, Trump has 3 must-win states: Ohio, Florida, and North Carolina. (Polling finds that Trump narrowly overtook Clinton in mid-September in all three.) If Hillary Clinton wins any of those states, it'll be a knockout blow.

But in addition to the 15 states where President Obama beat Romney by at least 10 points, which Clinton isn't going to lose, Clinton has 5 must-win states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Virginia. (Polling finds her ahead in all five.) The first four are part of the Blue Wall; the Old Dominion is not. If Trump wins any of those states, he'll be headed to the White House.

So there are eight potential knockout states in this election, and five of them are being defended by Hillary Clinton.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/electoral-mapmaking/article/2004500">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/09/24/five-paths-victory-trump/">The Weekly Standard: Five paths to victory for Trump. appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

The Sacramento Bee: As Legislature stalemates on State Bar bill, the fallout begins

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California.png"> class="size-medium wp-image-64913 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California-300x37.png" alt="State Bar of California" width="300" height="37" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California-300x37.png 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California.png 460w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

Capitol Alert /> By Dan Walters /> dwalters@sacbee.com /> September 2, 2016 – 10:49 AM

Wednesday night's legislative stalemate on giving the State Bar permission to continue collecting dues from the state's lawyers and, more controversially, overhauling its organization and operations, is already creating fallout.

id="more-69929">Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee, whose reform measures were stymied in the Senate Judiciary Committee, immediately fired off a five-page letter to the State Bar, which licenses and regulates lawyers, seeking detailed information on its finances, including its reserves, its non-dues income and specifics on spending. The letter also asked Elizabeth Parker, the State Bar's executive director, who was brought in to straighten out the agency after a series of scandals and scathing audits, to detail how the State Bar will reform itself.

In the final days of the session, with private negotiations on a State Bar dues bill stalemated, members of the committee had grilled Parker sharply over a wide range of specific issues, including the extent of the agency's reserves and how long it could operate if it could not begin 2017 with continued authority to collect dues from attorneys.

Parker, meanwhile, announced on Thursday that the State Bar would ask the state Supreme Court, which shares oversight of the agency with the Legislature, to give it authority to collect at least some 2017 dues from lawyers “in the absence of legislative action.”

During a previous stalemate over State Bar dues authority, the Supreme Court authorized it to assess lawyers partial dues to keep its regulatory functions intact, but Parker said in her announcement that the new request “is expected to be more comprehensive…”

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article99544607.html">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/09/03/legislature-stalemates-state-bar-bill-fallout-begins/">The Sacramento Bee: As Legislature stalemates on State Bar bill, the fallout begins appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69901 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg" alt="Rejected" width="300" height="212" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg 412w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

John Myers /> Aug. 30, 2016 – 7:28 p.m.

Reporting from Sacramento–

Lawmakers on Tuesday narrowly rejected an effort to create new disclosure rules for California political mailers and money gathered from several donors into a single contribution.

id="more-69900">Assembly Bill 700 failed by a single vote in the state Senate, needing a supermajority of 27 senators to pass.

The complex campaign finance bill became ensnared in a disagreement this month over whether it represented more or less donor disclosure. The state's Fair Political Practices Commission voted to oppose late amendments to AB 700 regarding the disclosure rules for “earmarked” contributions.

The bill sought to address instances in which a political contribution is cash collected from a series of donors who ask the identified donor to then “earmark” the money for a particular campaign.

Jodi Remke, the FPPC chairwoman, wrote in a letter last week that the changes to AB 700 would create a “loophole” for some organizations to bypass the contribution limits.

Supporter of the bill disagreed with the FPPC's interpretation, but the disagreement may have proved a distraction in the bill's final days.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/31/new-campaign-donation-disclosure-rules-rejected-state-senate/">Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69901 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg" alt="Rejected" width="300" height="212" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg 412w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

John Myers /> Aug. 30, 2016 – 7:28 p.m.

Reporting from Sacramento–

Lawmakers on Tuesday narrowly rejected an effort to create new disclosure rules for California political mailers and money gathered from several donors into a single contribution.

id="more-69900">Assembly Bill 700 failed by a single vote in the state Senate, needing a supermajority of 27 senators to pass.

The complex campaign finance bill became ensnared in a disagreement this month over whether it represented more or less donor disclosure. The state's Fair Political Practices Commission voted to oppose late amendments to AB 700 regarding the disclosure rules for “earmarked” contributions.

The bill sought to address instances in which a political contribution is cash collected from a series of donors who ask the identified donor to then “earmark” the money for a particular campaign.

Jodi Remke, the FPPC chairwoman, wrote in a letter last week that the changes to AB 700 would create a “loophole” for some organizations to bypass the contribution limits.

Supporter of the bill disagreed with the FPPC's interpretation, but the disagreement may have proved a distraction in the bill's final days.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/31/new-campaign-donation-disclosure-rules-rejected-state-senate/">Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Monday, August 29, 2016

The San Francisco Chronicle: Almost 200 proposed laws await governor's OK - or not

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/California-Capitol.jpeg"> class=" wp-image-60925 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/California-Capitol.jpeg" alt="California Capitol" width="575" height="431" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/California-Capitol.jpeg 780w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/California-Capitol-300x225.jpeg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 575px) 100vw, 575px" />

By Melody Gutierrez /> Published: August 28, 2016 /> Updated:   August 28, 2016 – 8:37pm

SACRAMENTO - The fate of hundreds of bills will be decided by Wednesday, when state lawmakers wrap up their two-year session.

id="more-69879">There are already nearly 200 bills on Gov. Jerry Brown's desk, including legislation to eliminate the statute of limitation on rape prosecutions, limit the use of solitary confinement at juvenile detention facilities, and eliminate sales tax on tampons and other feminine hygiene products.

Lawmakers will decide how many more bills will make it to the governor's desk among the more than 300 bills remaining to be heard in the Senate and Assembly this week. Among those is a bill aimed at increasing voter participation in elections by transforming how people vote.

SB450 by Sen. Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica, would require county registrars to mail ballots to all voters, who could then return them by mail or drop them off at several locations in their county. Currently, voters can request mail ballots. The legislation also would give voters the option of casting votes in person on election day or in the 10 days leading up to it. The bill is awaiting a vote in the Senate.

“Our current broken system is simply failing us and is not leading to the type of representation and engagement and vibrancy we all hope for from a modern democracy such as ours,” Allen said.

While the fates of many bills have yet to be decided, Brown has already signed some of the session's biggest bills, including SB32 to extend the state's greenhouse gas reduction targets to 2030, and SB1279, which cuts off state funding to any port that ships coal into or out of California.

In July, Brown signed six gun control bills, which, among other things, will make it harder to buy ammunition in the state and make it illegal to own a magazine clip that holds more than 10 rounds. In April, Brown signed a bill that will raise the state's minimum wage to $15 over the course of six years.

“We have passed historic laws on climate change, gun safety and minimum wage, but we have unfinished business,” said Assemblyman David Chiu, D-San Francisco.

Gov. Jerry Brown has until Sept. 30 to sign or veto a bill that reaches his desk on Wednesday.

Here's a look at some of the other bills this session.

On the governor's desk:

•AB1995 Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara - Allows homeless students enrolled at a California Community Colleges campus to take showers at the school for their personal hygiene needs.

“I was once homeless while attending community college, so I personally know what it feels like to be desperate for a shower before attending classes,” Williams said.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Almost-200-proposed-laws-await-governor-s-OK-9189680.php?t=d0c0c54aa200af33be&cmpid=twitter-premium">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/29/almost-200-proposed-laws-await-governors-ok-not/">The San Francisco Chronicle: Almost 200 proposed laws await governor's OK - or not appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Friday, August 26, 2016

Sunday, August 21, 2016

The Press-Enterprise: Why 7 Inland cities think voters will OK tax increases this year

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Taxes.gif"> class="size-medium wp-image-8864 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Taxes-300x300.gif" alt="Taxes" width="300" height="300" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Taxes-300x300.gif 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Taxes-150x150.gif 150w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Taxes.gif 500w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

Seven Inland cities are asking voters to approve tax measures; four would raise sales taxes.

By Alicia Robinson / Staff Writer /> Published: Aug. 19, 2016 /> Updated: Aug. 21, 2016 12:24 a.m.

Several Riverside County cities are hoping to cut through the election season noise and convince residents to support tax increases to pay for police, fire and other key services.

id="more-69817">Voters in seven Inland cities will see local tax increases on the Nov. 8 ballot, though two of the measures would tax marijuana and thus hinge on the success of a statewide pot legalization initiative.

Four cities – Hemet, Menifee, Riverside and Temecula – will ask voters to increase the local sales tax by 1 percentage point or 1 cent, from 8 percent to 9 percent. Two others, Moreno Valley and San Jacinto, propose raising hotel room taxes, and San Jacinto and San Bernardino have pot taxes on the ballot.

The local measures reflect a broader trend of putting tax issues to a vote in even-year general elections, said Michael Coleman, fiscal policy adviser to the League of California Cities. Statewide, about 240 local tax issues will appear on ballots this fall, he said. About half are school bonds.

The general election vote is attractive partly because of the larger turnout, Coleman said, but how local issues fare “depends a lot on the local politics.”

THE NEED

Officials in the four cities asking for sales tax increases say they're facing deficits, largely because of rising costs for police and fire service.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.pe.com/articles/tax-811150-city-sales.html">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/21/why-7-inland-cities-think-voters-will-ok-tax-increases-year/">The Press-Enterprise: Why 7 Inland cities think voters will OK tax increases this year appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Friday, August 19, 2016

InlandPolitics: California Senate set to pass prosecutorial misconduct legislation

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prosecutorial-Misconduct1.jpg"> class="size-full wp-image-49847 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prosecutorial-Misconduct1.jpg" alt="Prosecutorial-Misconduct1" width="560" height="290" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prosecutorial-Misconduct1.jpg 560w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prosecutorial-Misconduct1-300x155.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px" />

Friday, August 19, 2016 – 08:45 a.m.

The California legislature is set to forward legislation targeting prosecutor misconduct to Governor Jerry Brown.

id="more-69799">Assembly Bill 1909, by Assembly Member Patty Lopez (D-San Fernando), partially propelled by high-profile allegations swirling around the Orange County District Attorney's Office, would bring criminal penalties to prosecutors.

The legislation has received bipartisan support and no recorded opposition.

In essence the legislation, if signed by Brown, would impose potential felonies on prosecutors who withhold, conceal or falsify evidence.

Here's key language the legislation would add to current law:

(c) A prosecuting attorney who intentionally and in bad faith alters, modifies, or withholds any physical matter, digital image, video recording, or relevant exculpatory material or information, knowing that it is relevant and material to the outcome of the case, with the specific intent that the physical matter, digital image, video recording, or relevant exculpatory material or information will be concealed or destroyed, or fraudulently represented as the original evidence upon a trial, proceeding, or inquiry, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, or two or three years.

The bill is currently on the Senate Floor, where it is scheduled for third reading and passage.

Here's are links to recent coverage of the legislation:

The Orange County Register: style="text-decoration: underline;"> href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/county-725339-prosecutors-orange.html">Prosecutors who falsify or withhold evidence could become felons under proposed state legislation /> Reason Magazine: style="text-decoration: underline;"> href="http://reason.com/blog/2016/08/16/california-bill-would-make-it-a-felony-f">California Bill Would Make It a Felony for Prosecutors to Withhold Evidence

Other related material:

href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Assembly-Bill-1909-Amended.pdf">Assembly Bill 1909 – Amended

 

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/19/california-senate-set-pass-prosecutor-misconduct-legislation/">InlandPolitics: California Senate set to pass prosecutorial misconduct legislation appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

The San Francisco Chronicle: The mystery behind California's high gas prices

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Gas-Prices.jpg"> class=" wp-image-66915 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Gas-Prices.jpg" alt="Gas Prices" width="575" height="371" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Gas-Prices.jpg 620w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Gas-Prices-300x194.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 575px) 100vw, 575px" />

Taxes on gasoline in the Golden State tend to be among the country's highest.

By David R. Baker /> August 15, 2016 /> Updated: August 15, 2016 – 4:47pm

Gasoline is cheap in California compared to a year ago.

But it's nowhere near as cheap as it could be.

id="more-69754">Californians currently spend 49 cents more per gallon than the national average, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. For most of the last year, that difference exceeded 60 cents. Several times last summer, it topped $1.

California routinely has some of the highest pump prices in the United States, the result of high taxes and the use of a pollution-reducing gasoline formula not sold elsewhere. But the premium we pay historically hovered between 25 and 35 cents per gallon. Relatively new expenses related to California's fight against global warming have added about 15 cents to that premium, but it can't explain the elevated prices that have persisted for 18 months.

By one estimate, the unusually wide gap between California's gasoline prices and the national average has cost the state's drivers more than $10 billion.

A panel of fuel-market experts convened by the state government has tried for months to pinpoint causes for the high prices. It will meet again Tuesday.

But despite exploring a number of possible answers, including the role and pricing power of refineries, the panel's chairman says he and his colleagues may not be able to prove any of them. Doing so, he said, would likely require far greater legal authority than the panel has.

“We have no subpoena power, we have no investigative power - all we can do is ask people to come talk to us,” said UC Berkeley energy economist Severin Borenstein, chairman of the state's Petroleum Market Advisory Committee. “If someone is going to really dig in, it's going to take more power.”

California Attorney General Kamala Harris has a representative on the committee, and in June, her office reportedly issued subpoenas to several oil companies, seeking information on gasoline supplies and pricing. (A spokesman for the attorney general declined to comment.)

But her office has investigated California's gasoline market before and come away empty-handed. And Borenstein fears that most state officials are ignoring the problem.

“There seems to be almost no interest among policy makers, and the reason is that prices are low,” he said. “Given that we're talking about billions of dollars, I think it'd be a good idea for California to make a bigger effort to find out going on.”

The Western States Petroleum Association did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.

Even in the best of circumstances, Californians pay more for gasoline than most Americans.

Taxes on gasoline in the Golden State tend to be among the country's highest. Federal, state and local taxes and fees add more than 50 cents per gallon for California drivers, according to the American Petroleum Institute - 9 cents more than the national average.

The state's “cap and trade” system for reining in the greenhouse gases behind climate change tacks on another 11 cents. A regulation that requires oil companies to lower the “carbon intensity” of the fuels they sell in California adds an estimated 4 cents. The California Energy Commission includes both expenses and several others under “distribution and marketing” (see accompanying graphic).

But the state also suffers from having a market largely cut off from outside suppliers.

California uses its own gasoline blends, designed to fight air pollution. Other states use different blends, so most of California's fuel comes from refineries located within the state.

If mechanical problems hobble one or more of those refineries, bringing in extra supplies from outside the state can take weeks. No pipelines connect California to the refineries on the Gulf Coast, so any imports must come by ship, traveling either from Asia or through the Panama Canal.

In February 2015, part of a Los Angeles County refinery then-owned by ExxonMobil exploded, and did not return to normal operations until May of this year. Gasoline prices jumped after the explosion, eventually hitting $3.44 for a gallon of regular, according to GasBuddy.com. The national average, in contrast, was $2.46.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/The-mystery-behind-California-s-high-gas-prices-9144337.php?t=d111477cb07d4f3860&cmpid=twitter-premium">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/16/mystery-behind-californias-high-gas-prices/">The San Francisco Chronicle: The mystery behind California's high gas prices appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

The Sacramento Bee: Jerry Brown offers 12 percent raises (over 4 years) to SEIU Local 1000

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Pay-Raise.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69582 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Pay-Raise-300x182.jpg" alt="Pay Raise" width="300" height="182" />

The State Worker /> By Rachel Cohrs /> rcohrs@sacbee.com /> July 29, 2016 – 10:17 AM

The state has offered a nearly 12 percent general salary increase for SEIU Local 1000 employees spread out over four years, or a 9 percent increase over three years.

id="more-69581">The offer, dated July 8, would also require increased payments into funding post-retirement health benefits amounting to a 3.5 percent increase in contributions over either three or four years.

California's largest state employee union is in the midst of contract negotiations with the governor's office. In a newsletter, SEIU officials wrote the talks had come to a “crossroads.”

In the union's most recent bargaining update posted on June 30, SEIU addressed members on its website stating, “Our bargaining team feels that the state's offer does not meet the priorities that you shared with us through town halls and bargaining surveys.”

The union held 13 town hall meetings for members across the state to get feedback on the bargaining process. SEIU also distributed an online survey to “get members' input about the state's offer.”

Allowable overtime mandates for registered nurses under Unit 17 would decrease from five to four per month, and mandatory overtime for medical and social services employees under Unit 20 would decrease from six to five.

To read expanded column, click href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/the-state-worker/article92603497.html">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/07/30/jerry-brown-offers-12-percent-raises-4-years-seiu-local-1000/">The Sacramento Bee: Jerry Brown offers 12 percent raises (over 4 years) to SEIU Local 1000 appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Monday, July 4, 2016

The American Spectator: When Trump Fought the Racists

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists.png"> class=" wp-image-69257 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists-1024x264.png" alt="WSJ - When Trump Fought The Racists" width="574" height="148" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists-1024x264.png 1024w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists-300x77.png 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists-768x198.png 768w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WSJ-When-Trump-Fought-The-Racists.png 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px" />

Jeffrey Lord /> November 13, 2015 – 9:00 am

And so the cry went up.

“Trump is a racist!” was the mocking cry from an off-stage Larry David when Trump recently hosted Saturday Night Live. The David bit was designed to make fun not of Trump but Trump's critics. In this case a left-wing group calling itself href="http://deportracism.com/">deportracism.com which, without the slightest sense of irony, put together a thoroughly racist ad having children spewing obscenities as they proclaimed their allegiance not to America and its ideals but rather to their race. A chilling reminder of all those fresh-faced young Germans of long ago pledging allegiance to their Aryan race.

id="more-69256">All of this is already old news. But there is a much older “old news” story about Trump that has now resurfaced - a story that paints a highly accurate portrait of the real Donald Trump - the guy who has no time for racism and anti-Semitism and stood up in public to fight both.

The story, linked by a group calling itself href="http://zionists4trump.com/how-trump-fought-antisemitism-and-racism-in-palm-beach-two-decades-ago/">Zionists for Trump, was href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB862335923489989500">published in the Wall Street Journal - in 1997. It revolves around Trump's purchase and operation of the famous Mar-a-Largo estate, built in the 1920s by Post Cereal heiress Marjorie Merriweather Post. Trump had recently purchased the sprawling, seaside estate and turned it into a club. This being located in upscale Palm Beach, Florida, there were other prestigious clubs in the area, clubs that catered to the old order of upper crust Palm Beach society. The problem? Quietly, these other clubs had long barred Jews and African Americans - which is to say they practiced a quiet but steely racism.

The Zionists for Trump headline:

style="text-align: center;">How Trump Fought Antisemitism and Racism in Palm Beach Two Decades Ago

The WSJ story that is linked focuses on the battles Trump faced as a new arrival to Palm Beach, including his new competition with the social clubs of the old order. The story, which quotes Abe Foxman, the longtime head of the Anti-Defamation League, says, in part, the following:

Mr. Trump also has resorted to the courts to secure his foothold here, and many residents wince at the attention his legal battles with the town have drawn - to the town in general, and to the admission practices at some of Palm Beach's older clubs in particular.

…The culture clash began to approach a climax last fall, when Mr. Trump's lawyer sent members of the town council a copy of the film “Guess Who's Coming to Dinner,” a film that deals with upper-class racism. Mr. Trump then approached the town council about lifting the restrictions that had been placed on the club. He also asked some council members not to vote on the request because their membership in other clubs created a conflict of interest.

Last December, after the council refused to lift the restrictions, Mr. Trump filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Palm Beach, alleging that the town was discriminating against Mar-a-Lago, in part because it is open to Jews and African-Americans. The suit seeks $100 million in damages.

… Mr. Foxman seems pleased that Mr. Trump has elevated the issue of discriminatory policies at social clubs. “He put the light on Palm Beach,” Mr. Foxman says. “Not on the beauty and the glitter, but on its seamier side of discrimination. It has an impact.”

In recent weeks, Mr. Foxman says, the league has received calls from Jewish residents telling of how Palm Beach clubs are changing. Locals concur that in the past year, organizations such as the Bath and Tennis Club have begun to admit Jewish patrons. The Palm Beach Civic Association, which for many years was believed to engage in discriminatory behavior, this month named a Jewish resident as its chief officer.

In other words? In other words, long before he was running for president, there was Donald Trump battling racism and anti-Semitism in Palm Beach society. Using every tool at his disposal.

To read expanded column, click href="http://spectator.org/64643_when-trump-fought-racists/">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/07/04/trump-fought-racists/">The American Spectator: When Trump Fought the Racists appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Two updates

Phone had not stopped ringing this morning and I'm trying to get work done so this will be quick.  There have been multiple confirmations on both.


FBI is looking at Shark issue and haa interviewed at least one person so far.


Michael Dauber, Grand Jury Legal Advisor, haa asked the Grand Jury Assistant to destroy investigation records for the DCS investigation.  Are you listening FBI?

Thursday, June 9, 2016

IEBCA baseball all-star game rosters

The annual IEBCA all-star game, at San Manuel Stadium, is June 14 at 7 p.m., with the regular San Bernardino County vs. Riverside County format. Here are the rosters as announced by the 66ers: Click below for the Riverside County … Continue reading

Friday, May 27, 2016

San Bernardino County CIF-SS softball updates

Here are all of the San Bernardino County first round CIF-SS softball scores, with schedules for Tuesday's 2nd round: DIVISION 1 Etiwanda 7, King 2 Chino 5, Rosary 3 Vista Murrieta 2, Chino Hills 0 Tuesday's Games Etiwanda at Mater … Continue reading

Monday, May 9, 2016

CIF-SS Girls Swimming Championships Preview

High school athletes from the CIF Southern Section will jump into the pool throughout the week at Riverside City College for the 2016 swim finals. On the Division 2 girls side, Ayala's Kenisha Liu and Redlands' Melissa Pepper return with … Continue reading

Friday, April 22, 2016

Activists plan protest at Orange County animal shelter

Animal welfare advocates plan to protest in front of Orange County Animal Care (OCAC) in Southern California this coming Saturday, April 23, 2016.  The advocates say animals are being euthanized without being given a chance for adoption.  They say the average time from owner surrender to death is 43 minutes.


Dr. Jennifer Hawkins, Director of Orange County Animal Care, has come under fire for what is perceived as her mission of killing rather than any attempt at saving lives, which is in direct opposition to the Veterinarian Oath.  That oath reads in pertinent part:



Being admitted to the profession of veterinary medicine, I solemnly swear to use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of society through the protection of animal health and welfare, the prevention and relief of animal suffering, the conservation of animal resources, the promotion of public health, and the advancement of medical knowledge.



Advocates also accuse Hawkins of falsifying shelter statistics and violating the Hayden Law, much of which remains in effect despite some state-mandated provisions being suspended.  Hayden Law requires that shelters release unwanted animals to a rescue at the rescue's request under most circumstances.


To read the entire article, click here.

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Videos from Cajon's State Championship game

Here are videos from Cajon's state championship game, postgame interviews as well as final seconds: Kayla Washington talks: Turner twins talk: Taylor Goldsberry talks Coach Mark Lehman talks Cajon awards ceremony Final seconds of the game Share this

Videos from Cajon's State Championship game

Here are videos from Cajon's state championship game, postgame interviews as well as final seconds: Kayla Washington talks: Turner twins talk: Taylor Goldsberry talks Coach Mark Lehman talks Cajon awards ceremony Final seconds of the game Share this

Friday, March 11, 2016

Capital Public Radio: Reservoirs Filling, But Snowpack Worries In California

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/water-dam.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-25819"> class="size-full wp-image-25819 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/water-dam.jpg" alt="water-dam" width="500" height="375" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/water-dam-300x225.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/water-dam.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" />

Ed Joyce /> Thursday, March 10, 2016 | Sacramento, CA |

The early March storms offset three dry weeks in February, in terms of precipitation, and helped fill some California reservoirs. But the U.S. Drought Monitor says warm temperatures did not build snowpack at lower elevations in the Sierra Nevada.

id="more-67459">The first wave of ‘Miracle March’ storms in California offset three dry weeks in February and improved storage in some reservoirs. Now, the state is primed for drought improvement, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor released March 10.

Storms last week brought California “some badly-needed precipitation after rather dry and mild conditions the past 3 weeks [February] caused a sharp decline in the Water Year-To-Date (WYTD) precipitation and snowpack that were both above-normal in early February.”

“Therefore, considering that this storm basically negated the decline caused by the prior 3 weeks of dryness and warmth, no changes were made this week,” according to the weekly update. “However, with the state [California] now recharged with short-term moisture, any additional precipitation, especially from a colder system (e.g. lower elevation snows), should provide some improvement to the state, especially in northern and central areas.”

The weekly cutoff time for the Drought Monitor is 7 a.m. EST Tuesday. So, any drought improvement from the series of storms the first week of March in California will be reflected in the March 17 report.

Despite expecting big increases in precipitation and snowpack, in what is normally one of the wettest months of the year in California, the last three weeks of February “stalled” or lowered both. In terms of precipitation, there was improvement to above-normal in the “northern, central (San Joaquin), and southern (Tulare basin) Sierra station indices.”

“More good news from the recent storm was that reservoir storages did increase from the heavy rains and snowmelt from the lower elevations,” the report says.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.capradio.org/articles/2016/03/10/reservoirs-filling,-but-snowpack-worries-in-california/">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/03/11/capital-public-radio-reservoirs-filling-snowpack-worries-california/">Capital Public Radio: Reservoirs Filling, But Snowpack Worries In California appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Daily Bulletin: Paul Chabot files to run against Rep. Pete Aguilar

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Paul-Chabot.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-53475"> class="size-medium wp-image-53475 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Paul-Chabot-300x199.jpg" alt="Paul-Chabot" width="300" height="199" />

Chabot

By Sandra Emerson, Redlands Daily Facts /> Posted: 03/08/16 – 9:01 PM PST |

The race to represent the 31st District in Congress is officially under way.

id="more-67443">Paul Chabot, a Republican, on Tuesday filed his paperwork to run against Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-San Bernardino, who is seeking re-election in November.

Chabot, of Rancho Cucamonga, said his campaign will focus on national security, crime reduction, job creation and improving youth education.

“Those four areas are very critical to not only the strength of the Inland Empire, but also the strength of our nation, and we are well behind where we should be both as a community and as a country,” Chabot said by phone Tuesday.

Chabot said also among his priorities is reopening Norton Air Force Base as a joint military base, which he said could create 20,000 jobs in the district.

Chabot, of Rancho Cucamonga, announced his campaign in February 2015, just three months after losing to Aguilar in November 2014.

Aguilar, who was serving as mayor of Redlands at the time of his election to Congress, announced last month his intention to run for re-election in 2016.

To kick off his campaign, Aguilar will host an event at 6 p.m. Wednesday at V.F.W. Post 8737 in San Bernardino.

“Inland Empire families deserve a leader who will get them the results they deserve,” Aguilar said Tuesday in an emailed statement. “I’m running for re-election to continue working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to help put residents back to work, improve our education system and protect critical programs for veterans and seniors.”

Republican Sean Flynn, an Upland resident and author of “Economics for Dummies,” in January announced his campaign for the seat. Flynn has been endorsed by San Bernardino City Councilman Henry Nickel and has been named an “On the Radar” candidate in the National Republican Congressional Committee’s Young Guns program, according to Flynn’s website.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/government-and-politics/20160308/paul-chabot-files-to-run-against-rep-pete-aguilar">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/03/09/daily-bulletin-paul-chabot-files-run-rep-pete-aguilar/">Daily Bulletin: Paul Chabot files to run against Rep. Pete Aguilar appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Monday, February 15, 2016

From an anonymous source: Fontana Police Department

I, along with media around the Southland, received the email below anonymously a few minutes ago. It is the second email I've received about the hearing tomorrow.


The email has too much specificity to ignore. It matches up with much of the inquiry I did a couple years ago when I was looking at Fontana Police Department. I suspect there is a lot of credibility to it.


I believe the attorney for the officer is from LDME and Chris Gaspar's old firm. If so, she will be a power to reckon with. I like the idea they want this out in the public. Shining a light on corruption is never a bad thing. Here is the email:


Recently and allegedly terminated Fontana, CA Police Chief Rodney Jones was subpoenaed to appear at the appeal hearing of a Fontana Police Corporal to take place at an open/public hearing in the Fontana City Council Chambers on Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 9:00 AM.


A case which originally was a termination case, overturned on appeal and has now been changed to a 30-Day suspension which is now under appeal. The hearing body will be the Fontana City Council.


The case involves (2) Fontana Police Officer's who intervened off-duty where a neighbor's residents were involved in a case of Domestic Violence. The officer's intervened and detained the involved suspect for awaiting law enforcement.


An internal affair's investigation was initiated by then Chief Rodney Jones; who based much of his information given to him by Lieutenant Gary Aulis of the Fontana Police Department. Lt. Aulis's account of information given to him by the involved officer's differed from that of the officer's account as to what was said. Based on this, Chief Jones attempted to terminate the officer's involved.


What will allegedly be revealed at the hearing is that the conversation containing information given to Lieutenant Gary Aulis by the involved officer's was recorded by one of the officer's which corroborates the officer's account of what was said, and calls into question Lt. Aulis' account as to what was said.


It is alleged former Chief Rodney Jones was attempting to avoid having to appear on the case. A process server served Jones with a subpoena at a Fontana City Council Meeting on Tuesday, February 9, 2016 when he appeared to receive an service award from the city council. Jones allegedly was fired by City Manager Ken Hunt, but was allowed to retire with time served in lieu of termination. Jones received a $200,000.00 severance per his contract.


Jones was allegedly visibly angered upon being served with the subpoena, which was done as the current Rialto, CA. Police Chief Randall DeAnda stood next to Jones. It was believed Jones would have gone into hiding prior to the hearing had he not been served in this manner.


The officer who is the party of tomorrow's hearing, David Moore, is decorated, award winning African American officer who has been the department's Employee of the Year among many other awards.


Systemic racism, cronyism, and sexism have long been the standing rule at the Fontana Police Department and many employees see former Chief Jones' removal as a step in removing some of the last of "The Good Ole' Boys" from the police administration. In this case, the lasting effects are still present.


Moore allegedly requested a public hearing so the Fontana City Council, and the public could see into the public corruption that is rampant in within police department; namely the Fontana Police Department.


Corporal Moore is represented by Attorney Kasey Castillo of Castillo & Harper APC in Ontario, CA.


The attorney hired by City Manager Ken Hunt to make a case against the officer's is Paul Coble of Jones & Mayer of Fullerton, CA. This law firm is notorious for helping police department's throughout California engage in the malicious prosecution of officer's whom have officer's police administrators wish to rid themselves of.


Attorney Paul Coble is a retired LAPD captain, and is seen as part of the "Old Guard" that fights to keep in place systemic corruption which enables police department's to treat their employees as they see fit with impunity.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Of Lovingood and opponents

I figure I might just as well say this upfront before the filing period even begins. It is my intent to endorse no one for First District during the primary. On June 8, I will endorse the challenger who makes it into the top two and will do everything I can do to help that person. Of course my secret wish is that Lovingood comes in third place, which would complicate things a bit, and it is unrealistic to believe that could happen.


As it stands now, there are at least four challengers, maybe five if both Rick and Angela decide to run. Any one of the five would make a better supervisor than Supervisor Bob.


It is my plan to write positive stories on the challengers based mostly on press releases they send or events I happen to attend. I will not write a story where one is bashing the other. Getting rid of Lovingood is too important. The only negative I would consider is if one were to go off the deep end like Phil Libertore did with his stolen valor crap and all the lies and Paul Schrader did by enlisting crazies to run his campaign and all his lies. Otherwise, the stories will be positive only. I will leave it up to the campaigns to send me press releases or other information. I'm not sure if I will seek out interviews or not. We shall see how it goes.


This is the first district we are talking about, so it is entirely possible a crazy or two or three will also enter the race, but unless they do something egregious, I will write positive stories about them also as long as they provide me with press releases.


And no, I do not feel this is wrong. Lovingood has the Daily Press to publish all of his campaign pieces for him so it is only fair his opponents have an outlet as well. For me, mostly they will be Examiner stories but there may be a blurb here and there on iePolitics.


So ladies and gentlemen, all of you have my cell phone number. Call any time if you want a story. Just remember, the story has to be about you and your plans and accomplishments. I will not write a story bashing your fellow challengers.


Also, for anyone running who is doing so on the cheap, if you want help with grammar or proofreading, I'm happy to help. Just give me a couple of days to get it done. I think everyone knows my pet peeve about illiterate-sounding campaign mail, signs, and ballot statements.


As a footnote, I'm probably guilty of a few typos and grammatical errors tonight as well. Today was so darn beautiful outside I could not stop going for walks. I walked for 2.5 hours. I am in major pain tonight so I really don't care about typos. And the Aguire story is waiting until tomorrow. Be sure to look for it. I would say what is happening is appalling, but nothing from the fifth floor appalls any more. It is just more business as usual but disgusting nonetheless.


Sunday, January 31, 2016

Commentary: Records request for BOS salaries yields unexpected results

It seems nothing is ever routine when dealing with San Bernardino County.  After searching the county’s website and not finding what I needed, I submitted a request under the California Public Records Act for the base salaries of the members of the Board of Supervisors earlier this week for a couple of other projects I am working on with no expectation of writing this article.


As is my usual practice, I submitted the request to David Wert, Public Information Officer for the county.  Wert usually replies quickly with the needed information unless the county does not want to give it up.  Then I must wait about 10 days for a letter from County Counsel wanting some exorbitant amount of money to “research” my request.


I could not imagine there could be a problem in this situation as this information is public record even if not easily found on the county’s website.  However, after two days I had not heard back from Wert.


To read entire article, click here.

The Sentinel: Ramos’s Quashing Of Grand Jury Probes Seen As Obstruction Of Justice

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/San-Bernardino-County-Grand-Jury.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66731"> class=" wp-image-66731 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/San-Bernardino-County-Grand-Jury.jpg" alt="San Bernardino County Grand Jury" width="160" height="157" />

By Mark Gutglueck /> Saturday, January 30, 2016

County civil grand jurors who have taken up investigations deemed highly problematic for top elected officials, senior county staff members and department heads and the county itself have been forced to drop those lines of inquiry and threatened with prosecution if they persist in exploring those issues, the Sentinel is informed.

id="more-66730">The subjects involved, the Sentinel has learned, pertain to the failure of the county’s child and family services division to stem the abuse of youths in the county’s foster care system, including incidents that resulted in the deaths of some children; sheriff’s department personnel acquiring title to vehicles impounded during department operations on a far larger scale than was previously reported by the immediate past civil grand jury; sheriff’s department supervisors imposing on deputies so-called ticket writing quotas as part of their patrol assignments; incidents in which county jail inmates were furnished or otherwise allowed access to intoxicants; and the use of sheriff’s department helicopters for purposes wholly unrelated to law enforcement, public safety and rescue operations to transport high ranking department members, department members’ wives and girlfriends, campaign donors, political figures or their associates to locales both inside and outside the county, in some cases for highly inappropriate purposes.

What is suggested by the reports is that District Attorney Mike Ramos has overstepped his legitimate authority as San Bernardino County’s top prosecutor to quash or have the deputy prosecutor overseeing the grand jury quash the investigations, either to protect from prosecution or save from embarrassment certain county officials or to limit the potential of county liability that might ensue if the degree to which certain county employees acted misappropriately, negligently or illegally were to be documented. It has been reported that in one case in particular, Ramos engaged in what might be construed as an effort to obstruct justice by meeting with top county officials in a “strategy session” aimed at devising a “cover story.”

At issue in the brewing scandal is whether top county officials have interfered with the legitimate independent investigative purview of the grand jury or whether grand jurors themselves violated the confidentiality of the grand jury’s proceedings.

All counties in California are required under the California Constitution as well as Title 4 and Title 5 of the California Penal Code along with Government Code 3060 to have at least one grand jury impaneled at all times.

Most standing grand juries in California, including San Bernardino County’s grand jury, are referred to as civil grand juries and have a session that is coterminous with the government fiscal year running from July 1 through June 30. These grand juries do not typically deal with criminal matters, per se, but are chartered to focus primarily on oversight of government institutions at the county level or lower, such as cities or water, fire, school and community services districts or any entity which receives public money. If in the course of such an investigation the grand jury comes upon indications or evidence of real or potential criminal activity, it is at liberty to gather that information and both pass it along to the appropriate law enforcement agency and document it in a report, in either ad hoc form in the annual grand jury report put out toward the end of its term in June.

Grand juries have the authority to charge public officials with “willful or corrupt misconduct in office.” Such accusations under the California Constitution and state law are to be tried in the same manner as a criminal indictment, and may not be dismissed for political or extra-legal motives. The definition of “willful misconduct in office” specifies serious misconduct that constitutes criminal behavior or “purposeful failure to carry out mandatory duties of office.”

In San Bernardino County, going back at least as far as district attorney Jerome Kavanaugh in the late 1930s and 1940s, the district attorney’s office has provided the civil grand jury with an advisor. That policy continued under all subsequent district attorneys – Lowell Lathrop, Jim Cramer, Dennis Kottmeier, Dennis Stout and Mike Ramos. And while the advisor’s role is supposed to be limited to providing guidance as to the law and its applicability with regard to the matters taken up by the grand jurors, in San Bernardino County the advisor has taken on a more powerful and controlling role than is provided for under the law, often leading the grand jury, seeking to control it or curtail it, rather than simply serving to provide legal guidance. In many cases over the years the areas into which grand juries have sought to insert themselves have been rife with embarrassment or worse for the district attorney, his office, or the offices or functions of his political allies and associates in and out of county government. In some cases, a grand jury has gotten a hold on some issue that, if or when fully exposed and documented, might have or did lead to individuals, groups, businesses or entities harmed by that action filing civil action in the form of a lawsuit that could have resulted in or did lead to an adjudicated verdict or settlement that could have or did cost the county substantial amounts of money. On more than one occasion, these incipient investigations have been smothered by the grand jury advisor, almost always at the insistence of the district attorney himself.

Yet that is not how the system was intended to work as, indeed, the civil grand jury process was designed as a means of accountability for all elements of the local governmental structure, including the district attorney and his office.

It is that abasement of the grand jury’s function that has led to the current contretemps.

The 2014-15 Grand Jury took up a number of issues, including at least three pertaining to the sheriff’s department. Those involved looking into the conditions at five of the detention facilities/jails the department runs, the department’s towing procedures and an examination of the department’s aviation division. /> All three of those investigations dealt with potentially explosive issues.

Even as the grand jury was looking into the conditions in the county jails, four separate lawsuits were filed in roughly the same time frame alleging a pattern of guard-on-prisoner brutality that included beatings, the use of electric shock and sadistic sexual abuse. The FBI launched an investigation as well, “walking off” from the West Valley Detention Center four jailors who were subsequently, along with one other deputy, fired by the department. Nevertheless, the 2014-15 Grand Jury Report made no mention of the abuse of prisoners.

The investigation of the department’s towing procedures came about after complaints were made that vehicles impounded by tow companies with towing service arrangements with the sheriff’s department’s various substations were subsequently purchased by department personnel at lien sales conducted by those towing companies. While the grand jury report acknowledged reports of “employees purchasing vehicles at lien sales after a vehicle has been impounded by a tow company or after a vehicle had been seized during an investigation,” the report made no specific references to the sheriff’s department personnel who had actually made those purchases. Rather, the report stated somewhat languidly that steps are to be taken to put into each of the sheriff’s stations’ towing service agreements an addendum that states “All companies participating in the towing service agreement will no longer be allowed or permitted to sell and or give vehicles, motorcycles, motorized vehicles and/or any other property directly related to the towing businesses that are currently enrolled in the towing service agreement to a sheriff’s department employee and/or their immediate family.”

To read expanded article, click href="http://sbcsentinel.com/2016/01/ramoss-quashing-of-grand-jury-probes-seen-as-obstruction-of-justice/">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/01/30/the-sentinel-ramoss-quashing-of-grand-jury-probes-seen-as-obstruction-of-justice/">The Sentinel: Ramos’s Quashing Of Grand Jury Probes Seen As Obstruction Of Justice appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

San Bernardino’s Alex Mattison picks Boise State

Above, Alex Mattison talks in September about getting recruited despite people telling him he should transfer away from San Bernardino HS I'm glad things are working out for Alex Mattison. He's a great kid, who works hard and stayed at … Continue reading

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Michigan child molester gets 135 years to life

Edward Thomas, a 53-year-old Michigan man, was sentenced on Tuesday in San Bernardino Superior Court to 135 years to life in state prison.  He was convicted of nine counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child.

The case came about after Jane Doe reported the abuse to her mom in 2013.  She had endured the abuse for approximately 10 years, starting when she was only 5 years old.  She did not tell anyone for many years.  Once an adult, Jane Doe realized there could be other victims so she told her mother what had happened to her for all of those years.

"Due to fears that there could potentially be more victims, Jane Doe was finally able to disclose the terrible abuse she endured for over ten years," said San Bernardino County Deputy District Attorney Morrissa Cardoza, who prosecuted the case.

To read the entire article, click here.

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

InlandPolitics: Gas Price Manipulation: Time for taxpayers to build and lease refineries

Gas Prices

Wednesday, January 13, 2015 – 09:00 a.m.

It's time for California taxpayers to float bonds to construct and lease, at a minimum, two mega-gasoline refineries within the state.

The latest round of "unscheduled" maintenance shutdown of three Tesoro West Coast refineries, combined with a plan to conduct early spring maintenance, by other oil companies, will undoubtedly translate into future false claims of gasoline shortages in the state.

Those claims will be followed by artificial price spikes at the pump, meant to cause California drivers to pay more, thus cushion weakening oil company profit margins.

It's actually a novel idea.

Oh! Let's not forget the usual non-injury refinery explosion that causes further disruption.

As the price of crude oil continues its collapse, driver's in most other states are paying well below $2 per gallon for regular unleaded. But not in the Golden State.

In California, the price has been hovering around $3 per gallon.

Yes. Float a ballot initiative to pony-up the dough, exempt the project from state environmental laws to speed construction in regions away from densely-populated areas, and we're in business.

Use net gas sale proceeds to pay off the bonds.

The impact will put an end, once and for all, to state drivers being price gouged.

The state could request proposals from private companies to operate the facilities.

The post InlandPolitics: Gas Price Manipulation: Time for taxpayers to build and lease refineries appeared first on InlandPolitics.com.

The Sacramento Bee: Tax increase backers add reserve, per Jerry Brown demand

Capitol Alert
By David Siders
dsiders@sacbee.com
January 12, 2016 10:46 AM

  • Effort to extend Proposition 30 taxes changed to include reserve account funding

Less than a week after Gov. Jerry Brown criticized a ballot measure to extend temporary tax increases for containing the “fatal flaw” of circumventing California’s budget reserve requirements, proponents of the initiative said Tuesday that they have amended the proposal to address his complaint.

Education groups and other activists proposing to extend taxes approved in 2012 re-wrote their initiative to include deposits into a reserve account approved by voters in 2014.

Democratic strategist Gale Kaufman said in an email that her group made the changes “after listening to Gov. Brown’s concerns last week.”

The Democratic governor, who championed the Proposition 30 tax measure in 2012 has said repeatedly that higher taxes voters authorized that year should remain temporary. But when asked at a news conference last week if there was any tax extension he could support, he demurred.

To read expanded article, click here.

The post The Sacramento Bee: Tax increase backers add reserve, per Jerry Brown demand appeared first on InlandPolitics.com.

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

2015 Fall Mountain Valley League all-league teams

Here are the Mountain Valley League all-league teams FOOTBALL Girls Volleyball Boys Water polo Share this