Saturday, October 15, 2016

The Sun: San Bernardino County official charged in DUI had prior conviction, future in question

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-55898 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg" alt="SBCO" width="300" height="154" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg 667w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

 

By Joe Nelson, The Sun /> Posted: 10/14/16 – 4:30 PM PDT |

West Covina Councilman Mike Spence has battled alcoholism and drug abuse for more than 20 years, he said during a recent interview when confronted about a DUI he pleaded guilty to in 1998.

id="more-70298">The revelations may place Spence's future with San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman, for whom he is chief of staff, in question.

Spence, 50, ran for 55th District state Assemblyman this year, but he came in third in the June primary. He has been candid in admitting to his alcoholism and use of methamphetamine and cocaine, and said he has attended 12-step programs including Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous.

He has even admitted to having blackouts.

In February 1998, Spence pleaded guilty in West Valley Superior Court in Rancho Cucamonga to one misdemeanor count of driving under the influence of alcohol, court records show.

“I never claimed to be perfect,” Spence said in a recent telephone interview. “That was something that happened 20 years ago.”

On June 12, Spence crashed his rented Hyundai Accent into a utility pole near the intersection of Azusa Avenue and Cypress Street in Covina. Police determined he was driving under the influence of an illegal drug - methamphetamine. A toxicology report revealed there was no alcohol in his system.

Spence was charged Sept. 26 with one misdemeanor count of driving under the influence of a drug, a misdemeanor. He is scheduled for arraignment Thursday in West Covina Superior Court.

Per the terms of his 1998 plea agreement, Spence was ordered by Superior Court Judge Michael J. Welch to attend a county-approved alcohol program, pay a fine of $1,224, and serve three years probation. He was granted a restricted driver's license allowing him to drive to and from work and to his alcohol treatment program, court records show.

In California, prior misdemeanor convictions older than 10 years are not alleged in a defendant's new misdemeanor filing, according to Sarah Ardalani, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office.

“That said, there were no prior previous convictions listed in the current misdemeanor complaint against Michael Spence,” Ardalani said in an email.

San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman said in a telephone interview he was unaware of Spence's 1998 DUI conviction, and previously stated he was unaware of Spence's longtime struggle with addiction. He said he did not meet Spence until 2007, during his campaign for state Assembly.

Hagman appointed Spence as his chief of staff when he was elected 55th District state Assemblyman in 2008, then kept him on as his chief of staff when he was elected Fourth District county supervisor in 2014.

“I do believe in people starting anew,” said Hagman, adding that Spence, in the 10 years he has worked for Hagman, has always been an exemplary employee.

“In the (state) Assembly, we'd do independent assessments of each office's operations, and my office always came in at number one,” Hagman said.

Spence suffered severe injuries including a broken back, hip, femur, and ribs in his June 12 accident. He has been recovering ever since. He still claims to have no recollection of the day of his accident, and while he has admitted to having blackouts in the past, he could not say if his accident was a drug-induced blackout, as he has not been provided a copy of the accident report as he has requested.

“The hospital told me blackouts in car accidents happen all the time,” Spence said.

Spence's admissions regarding his addictions have sounded an alarm with Hagman.

“It definitely raises concerns,” Hagman said. He said the county has good health benefits and other resources available, which he encourages Spence utilize.

“We wish him a speedy recovery, and to address those demons that he's facing,” Hagman said. He said it is still too soon to say if he will retain Spence as his chief of staff.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sbsun.com/government-and-politics/20161014/san-bernardino-county-official-charged-in-dui-had-prior-conviction-future-in-question">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/15/san-bernardino-county-official-charged-dui-prior-conviction-future-question/">The Sun: San Bernardino County official charged in DUI had prior conviction, future in question appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

InlandPolitics: Expanded coverage of San Bernardino County dead children cover-up

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-55898 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg" alt="SBCO" width="300" height="154" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO-300x154.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SBCO.jpg 667w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

Thursday, October 13, 2016 – 09:00 a.m.

San Bernardino County hiring am outside law firm to represent it in an unfolding scandal involving multiple child deaths has thrown gas on the fire.

id="more-70270">Not-to-mention the abrupt retirement of Assistant Chief Executive Officer Linda Haugen.

The scandal-ridden Department of Children and Family Services (CFS) was under Haugen's area of responsibility.

Why the county feels it needs an outside law firm to communicate with the state attorney general, and now likely Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), raises serious questions.

Allegations of Grand Jury obstruction and cover-up are rampant.

This past Saturday's edition of the San Bernardino County Sentinel newspaper printed an expanded article on the subject.

To read the article, click href="http://sbcsentinel.com/2016/10/county-brings-in-hired-gun-to-stand-down-ag-probe-into-child-deaths/">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/13/expanded-coverage-san-bernardino-county-dead-children-cover/">InlandPolitics: Expanded coverage of San Bernardino County dead children cover-up appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Daily Bulletin: Ontario airport authority gears up for takeover

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69848 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority-300x178.jpg" alt="Ontario International Airport Authority" width="300" height="178" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority-300x178.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Ontario-International-Airport-Authority.jpg 380w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

By Liset Márquez, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin /> Posted: 10/03/16 – 4:25 PM PDT |

ONTARIO >> They say timing is everything.

When the Ontario International Airport Authority issues bonds Nov. 1 - the same day it formally takes over control of LA/Ontario International Airport - there could be some savings for future operations.

id="more-70195">Officials expect to issue the new bonds at lower interest costs.

The authority will assume $55.5 million in outstanding bonds debt for Ontario airport from Los Angeles World Airports, which operates the airport as well as Los Angeles International Airport.

“Cash flow savings on debt service will be offset by a like reduction in rates and charges paid by the airlines operating at the Airport in accordance with the terms of the Operating Use and Terminal Lease Agreements,” according to a staff report to the authority.

Officials won't know just how much is saved until the 2016 bonds are priced, which could happened by Oct. 17.

The 2016 bonds are scheduled to close in tandem with the transfer of the airport, according to the report.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/business/20161003/ontario-airport-authority-gears-up-for-takeover">here.

 

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/10/05/ontario-airport-authority-gears-takeover/">Daily Bulletin: Ontario airport authority gears up for takeover appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The Weekly Standard: Five paths to victory for Trump.

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg"> class=" wp-image-67628 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg" alt="Electoral Map - 2012" width="574" height="373" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012.jpg 998w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012-300x195.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Electoral-Map-2012-768x499.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px" />

Electoral Mapmaking /> Oct 03, 2016 | By Jeffrey H. Anderson

One of the most pervasive myths in American politics is that a “Big Blue Wall” will protect Democratic presidential nominees, perhaps even those who lose the popular vote. In truth, this electoral Blue Wall is more like a collection of disconnected forts-some imposing, some not-and the loss of any one of them would likely doom the Democratic nominee.

id="more-70115">The Blue Wall-states where the Democrats have won every presidential race since 1992-includes the entire Northeast except for New Hampshire, the Midwestern Great Lakes states aside from Ohio and Indiana, the three Pacific Coast states, and Hawaii. Even holding the wall is no guarantee of victory. John Kerry won the entire Blue Wall in 2004, plus New Hampshire, yet still lost to George W. Bush by 35 electoral votes. Al Gore won the entire Blue Wall in 2000-back when it was worth 13 more electoral votes-plus Iowa and New Mexico, yet still lost to Bush by 5 electoral votes. For the Democrats, holding the Blue Wall is necessary but not sufficient.

It is often claimed that Donald Trump has several must-win states, and this is true (although the states listed are often wrong). In addition to the 23 states that Mitt Romney won by at least 7 percentage points, which Trump isn't going to lose, Trump has 3 must-win states: Ohio, Florida, and North Carolina. (Polling finds that Trump narrowly overtook Clinton in mid-September in all three.) If Hillary Clinton wins any of those states, it'll be a knockout blow.

But in addition to the 15 states where President Obama beat Romney by at least 10 points, which Clinton isn't going to lose, Clinton has 5 must-win states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Virginia. (Polling finds her ahead in all five.) The first four are part of the Blue Wall; the Old Dominion is not. If Trump wins any of those states, he'll be headed to the White House.

So there are eight potential knockout states in this election, and five of them are being defended by Hillary Clinton.

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/electoral-mapmaking/article/2004500">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/09/24/five-paths-victory-trump/">The Weekly Standard: Five paths to victory for Trump. appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

The Sacramento Bee: As Legislature stalemates on State Bar bill, the fallout begins

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California.png"> class="size-medium wp-image-64913 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California-300x37.png" alt="State Bar of California" width="300" height="37" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California-300x37.png 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/State-Bar-of-California.png 460w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

Capitol Alert /> By Dan Walters /> dwalters@sacbee.com /> September 2, 2016 – 10:49 AM

Wednesday night's legislative stalemate on giving the State Bar permission to continue collecting dues from the state's lawyers and, more controversially, overhauling its organization and operations, is already creating fallout.

id="more-69929">Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee, whose reform measures were stymied in the Senate Judiciary Committee, immediately fired off a five-page letter to the State Bar, which licenses and regulates lawyers, seeking detailed information on its finances, including its reserves, its non-dues income and specifics on spending. The letter also asked Elizabeth Parker, the State Bar's executive director, who was brought in to straighten out the agency after a series of scandals and scathing audits, to detail how the State Bar will reform itself.

In the final days of the session, with private negotiations on a State Bar dues bill stalemated, members of the committee had grilled Parker sharply over a wide range of specific issues, including the extent of the agency's reserves and how long it could operate if it could not begin 2017 with continued authority to collect dues from attorneys.

Parker, meanwhile, announced on Thursday that the State Bar would ask the state Supreme Court, which shares oversight of the agency with the Legislature, to give it authority to collect at least some 2017 dues from lawyers “in the absence of legislative action.”

During a previous stalemate over State Bar dues authority, the Supreme Court authorized it to assess lawyers partial dues to keep its regulatory functions intact, but Parker said in her announcement that the new request “is expected to be more comprehensive…”

To read expanded article, click href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article99544607.html">here.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/09/03/legislature-stalemates-state-bar-bill-fallout-begins/">The Sacramento Bee: As Legislature stalemates on State Bar bill, the fallout begins appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69901 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg" alt="Rejected" width="300" height="212" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg 412w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

John Myers /> Aug. 30, 2016 – 7:28 p.m.

Reporting from Sacramento–

Lawmakers on Tuesday narrowly rejected an effort to create new disclosure rules for California political mailers and money gathered from several donors into a single contribution.

id="more-69900">Assembly Bill 700 failed by a single vote in the state Senate, needing a supermajority of 27 senators to pass.

The complex campaign finance bill became ensnared in a disagreement this month over whether it represented more or less donor disclosure. The state's Fair Political Practices Commission voted to oppose late amendments to AB 700 regarding the disclosure rules for “earmarked” contributions.

The bill sought to address instances in which a political contribution is cash collected from a series of donors who ask the identified donor to then “earmark” the money for a particular campaign.

Jodi Remke, the FPPC chairwoman, wrote in a letter last week that the changes to AB 700 would create a “loophole” for some organizations to bypass the contribution limits.

Supporter of the bill disagreed with the FPPC's interpretation, but the disagreement may have proved a distraction in the bill's final days.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/31/new-campaign-donation-disclosure-rules-rejected-state-senate/">Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.

Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate

style="text-align: center;"> href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg"> class="size-medium wp-image-69901 aligncenter" src="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg" alt="Rejected" width="300" height="212" srcset="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected-300x212.jpg 300w, http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Rejected.jpg 412w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />

John Myers /> Aug. 30, 2016 – 7:28 p.m.

Reporting from Sacramento–

Lawmakers on Tuesday narrowly rejected an effort to create new disclosure rules for California political mailers and money gathered from several donors into a single contribution.

id="more-69900">Assembly Bill 700 failed by a single vote in the state Senate, needing a supermajority of 27 senators to pass.

The complex campaign finance bill became ensnared in a disagreement this month over whether it represented more or less donor disclosure. The state's Fair Political Practices Commission voted to oppose late amendments to AB 700 regarding the disclosure rules for “earmarked” contributions.

The bill sought to address instances in which a political contribution is cash collected from a series of donors who ask the identified donor to then “earmark” the money for a particular campaign.

Jodi Remke, the FPPC chairwoman, wrote in a letter last week that the changes to AB 700 would create a “loophole” for some organizations to bypass the contribution limits.

Supporter of the bill disagreed with the FPPC's interpretation, but the disagreement may have proved a distraction in the bill's final days.

The post rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2016/08/31/new-campaign-donation-disclosure-rules-rejected-state-senate/">Los Angeles Times: New campaign donation disclosure rules rejected by the state Senate appeared first on rel="nofollow" href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog">InlandPolitics.com.